While preparing an article about the challenges of gastrodiplomacy at the local level, I came across a wide range of studies on the subject, which lies in the intersection of place branding, food heritage, gastronomic diplomacy, and paradiplomacy. 

You can also read my post on the subject:
delectable-diplomacy-gastrodiplomacy.html 
more-than-tacos-mexicos-scrumptious-yet-unknown-gastrodiplomacy.html 
 ten-years-later-mexicos-traditional-cuisine-and-gastrodiplomacy-efforts.html
 
Here is a list of some works on these topics:

Gastrodiplomacy
 
Center on Public Diplomacy. (2014). Gastrodiplomacy. Public Diplomacy Magazine, 11. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5be3439285ede1f05a46dafe/t/5be3511daa4a996fcaa498f3/1541624135259/GastroDiplomacy
 
Chappel-Sokol, S. (2013). Culinary Diplomacy: Breaking Bread to Win Hearts and Minds. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 8(2), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341244
 
DeSoucey, M. (2010). Gastronationalism: Food Traditions and Authenticity. Politics in the European Union. American Sociological Review, 75(3), 432–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410372226
 
González, S. M. (2021). Una aproximacion conceptual y literaria a la gastrodiplomacia como conductora de marca de un destino. PASOS Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural, 19(4), 737-751. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2021.19.048
 
Lee, S. T. & Kim, H. S. (2021). Food fight: gastrodiplomacy and nation branding in Singapore’s UNESCO bid to recognize Hawker culture. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 17(2), 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-020-00166-3
 
Mayer-Heft, G. y Samuel-Azran, T. (2022). Food for Thought: An Empirical Analysis of the Efficacy of Gastrodiplomacy. Food Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(1), 25-40. https://doi.org/10.18848/2160-1933/CGP/v13i01/25-40.
 
Nihayati, A., Pertiwi, E. A. & Inov Haripa. T. (2022). The Analysis of South Korean Gastrodiplomacy Towards the Increase of South Korean Kimchi Export. Journal of World Trade Studies, 6(2), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.22146/jwts.v6i2.3607
 
Nirwandy, N. & Azran Awang, A. (2014) Conceptualizing Public Diplomacy Social Convention Culinary: Engaging Gastro Diplomacy Warfare for Economic Branding. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.038
 
Pham, M. J. (2013). Food as Communication: A Case Study of South Korea’s Gastrodiplomacy. Journal of International Services, 22(1), 1-22. https://thediplomatistdotcom.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/jis-spring-2013-issue-gastrodiplomacy.pdf
 
Rockower, Paul. (2011). Projecting Taiwan: Taiwan´s Public Diplomacy Outreach. Issues and Studies, 47(1), 107-152.
 
Rockower, P- (2012). Recipes for gastrodiplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 8(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2012.17
 
Rockower, P. (2014). The State of Gastrodiplomacy. Public Diplomacy Magazine, 11, 11-15.
 
Rockower, P. (2019). A Guide to Gastrodiplomacy. In N. Snow y N. J. Cull (Eds.). Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, second edition, (pp. 205-212). https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Handbook-of-Public-Diplomacy/Snow-Cull/p/book/9781138610873
 
The Economist. (2002, February 21). Food as ambassador, Thailand’s gastrodiplomacy. The Economist.https://www.economist.com/asia/2002/02/21/thailands-gastro-diplomacy. 
 
Wilson, R. (2011). Cocina Peruana Para el Mundo: Gastrodiplomacy, the Culinary Nation Brand and the Context of National Cuisine. Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy 2 (1), p. 13-20.
 
Zhang, J. (2015). The Food of the Worlds: Mapping and Comparing Contemporary Gastrodiplomacy Campaigns. International Journal of Communication, 9, 568-591. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2847
 
 
Place branding
 
Askegaard, S. y Kjeldgaard, D. (2007). Here, There and Everywhere: Place Branding and Gastronomical Globalization in a Macromarketing Perspective. Journal of Macromarketing, 27(2), 138-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146707300068
 
Carrillo Nuño, E. G., Lara Pacheco, R. F. y Vidales Astello, B.A. (2019). Modelización de la atractividad territorial de las metrópolis. Política, Globalidad y Ciudadania, 5(10), 17-42. https://doi.org/10.29105/pgc5.10-1
 
Kihlgren Grandi, L. (2023). Branding, Diplomacy, and Inclusion: The Role of Migrant Cuisines in Cities´ Local and International Action. Societies 13(7), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13070151
 
 
Paradiplomacy
 
Iglesias, M., y Mancini, N. (2023). Criterios para evaluar buenas prácticas paradiplomáticas. En M. Iglesias, N. Mancini, J. A. Schiavon y P. Garza. (Coords.). Acción Exterior desde la mirada regional: Los casos de California, Catalunya, Guanajuato, Jujuy y Renania del Norte-Westphalia (pp. 27-43). Fundación Konard Adenauer, Paradiplomacia.org y Gobierno de Catalunya Delegación en México y en Centroamérica. https://www.kas.de/es/web/mexiko/einzeltitel/-/content/buenas-practicas-y-aproximaciones-para-la-medicion-de-la-accion-exterior-desde-la-mirada-regional
 
Lara Pacheco, R., Meléndez Yùdico, J. A. y Zapata Garesché, E. D. (2015). Cuadernos para la Internacionalización de las Ciudades número 5 Acción internacional para una ciudad atractiva. Proyecto AL-LAs. https://acimedellin.org/wp-content/uploads/publicaciones/Cuaderno-5-Accion-Internacional-para-una_Ciudad-Atractiva.pdf
 
Villarruel Reynoso, D., Lara Pacheco, R. F. y Loza Vázquez, M. G. (2023). Paradiplomacia y territorios periféricos: Una aproximación a través de casos de estudio. En D. Villarruel Reynoso (Coord.). Paradiplomacia municipal y territorios periféricos (pp. 19-38). Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Unidad de Apoyo Editorial. http://www.publicaciones.cucsh.udg.mx/kiosko/2023/Paradiplomacia.pdf
 
 
Food Heritage 
 
Bak-Geller Corona, S., Matta, R., y de Suremain, CÉ. (2019). Patrimonios alimentarios. Entre consensos y tensiones. El Colegio de San Luis. https://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/divers20-04/010078486.pdf
 
Cox‐Hall, A. (2019). Heritage‐prospecting and the past as future(s) in Peru. Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 24(2), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlca.12402
 
De Miguel Molina, M. et al. (2016) “Intangible Heritage and Gastronomy: The Impact of UNESCO Gastronomy Elements”. Journal of Culinary Science and Technology, 14(4), 293-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/15428052.2015.1129008
 
Hernández-Ramírez, J. (2018). Cuando la alimentación se convierte en gastronomía. Procesos de activación patrimonial de tradiciones alimentarias. Cultura-Hombre-Sociedad 28(1), 154-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.7770/0719-2789.2018.cuhso.01.a01
 
Romagnoli, M. (2019). Gastronomic heritage elements at UNESCO: problems, reflections, and interpretations of a new heritage category. International Journal of Intangible Heritage, 14, 158–171. https://www.ijih.org/volumes/article/844
 
Matta, R. (2019). Mexico’s ethnic culinary heritage and cocineras tradicionales (traditional female cooks). Food and Foodways, 27(3), 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/07409710.2019.1646481
 
Matta, R. (2021). Documenting the UNESCO feast: stories of women´s ‘empowerment’ and programmatic cooking. Social Anthropology /Antropologique sociale, 29(1), 188-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12990
 
Medina, F. X. (2009). Mediterranean diet, culture and heritage: Challenges for a new conception. Public Health Nutrition, (12)9A, 1618-1620. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980009990450
 
Moncusí A. & Santamarina B. (2008). Bueno para comer, bueno para patrimonializar. La propuesta de la cocina mexicana como patrimonio inmaterial de la humanidad. In M Alvarez and FX Medina (Eds) Patrimonio cultural y alimentación entre América y Europa, (pp. 127–142). Icaria.
 
UNESCO (n.d.). Proclamation of the Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity (2001-2005). https://ich.unesco.org/en/proclamation-of-masterpieces-00103.
 
Mexico´s gastrodiplomacy 
 
Arkansas en Español. (2010, October 29). Segunda Convención Anual 2010 de la Asociación de Restaurantes Mexicanos en Little Rock. Viva Arkansas. http://www.vivaarkansas.com/notas.asp?id=307.
 
CONACULTA. (2004). Pueblo de Maíz. La Cocina Ancestral de México. Ritos, Ceremonias y practicas culturales de la cocina de los mexicanos. Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes Ciudad de México. https://patrimonioculturalyturismo.cultura.gob.mx/publi/Pueblo_de_maiz/pueblo_maiz.pdf. 
 
CONACULTA. (2005). Capítulo 1: El Expediente Pueblo de Maíz, La Cocina Ancestral de México. In Patrimonio Cultural y Turismo. Cuadernos, No. 10. pp. 13-124. Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes. Ciudad de México. 
 
Foro Mundial de la Gastronomía Mexicana. (2018). About Us. https://www.ccgm.mx/fmgm/VI/about-us/.
 
García Ocejo, M. (2020, March 22). Cómo la UNESCO designó a la gastronomía mexicana Patrimonio de la Humanidad. El Heraldo de México. https://heraldodemexico.com.mx/cultura/2020/3/22/como-la-unesco-designo-la-gastronomia-mexicana-patrimonio-de-la-humanidad-161901.html.
 
Instituto de los Mexicanos en el Exterior -IME-. (2005). 25ª Jornada Informativa del IME: Gastronomía y Cultura Mexicana. Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores.
 
IME. (2006). 38ª Jornada Informativa del IME: Programa Trinacional de Gastronomía Mexicana. Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores.
 
IME. (2017). IME participa en el V Foro Mundial de la Gastronomía Mexicana. Press Bulletin. Secretataria de Relaciones Exteriores October, 5. https://www.gob.mx/ime/prensa/ime-participa-en-v-foro-mundial-de-la-gastronomia-mexicana?idiom=es.  
 
López Morales, G. (2005). Recapitulación. In Patrimonio Cultural y Turismo. Cuadernos, No. 10. Pp. 159-163. Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes. Ciudad de México.
 
Márquez Lartigue, R. (2021). Mexico´s unknown gastrodiplomacy strategy in the early 2000s in the United States: Contribution to a wider IR discipline. (Unpublished article). 
 
Martínez M., P. S. (2005, October 24). “Comiendo con los Muertos” en la Semana de Gastronomía y Cultura Mexicana en EU, Canadá y México. Azteca 21. http://www.azteca21.com/2005/10/24/comiendo-con-los-muertos-en-la-semana-de-gastronomia-y-cultura-mexicana-en-eu-canada-y-mexico/. 
 
Ponce, Karla. (2005, October 28). Día de Muertos en Tres Países. El Universal. https://archivo.eluniversal.com.mx/cultura/45612.html.
 
Protocolo. (2007, October 29). Inicia V Semana Trinacional de Gastronomía y Cultura Mexicana. Protocolo. https://www.protocolo.com.mx/gourmet/semana-trinacional-de-gastronomia-y-cultura-mexicana/. 
 
Protocolo. (2009, October 30). Inicia V Semana Trinacional de Gastronomía y Cultura Mexicana. Protocolo. http://www.protocolo.com.mx/gourmet/inicia-v-semana-trinacional-de-gastronomia-y-cultura-mexicana/. 
 
Ruiz Massieu, Claudia. (2015). Presentación Ven a Comer. Ven a Comer. Secretaría de Turismo, p. 7-8.
 
Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores -SRE-. (2007). Primer Informe de Labores. Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores. Ciudad de México.
 
SRE. (2011). Quinto Informe de Labores. Secretaría de Relaciones Exterioeres. Ciudad de México. 
 
SRE. (2012). Sexto Informe de Labores. Secretaría de Relaciones Exterioeres. Ciudad de México. 
 
SRE. (2016, June 17). La Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores presenta nuevas Acciones a favor de la Política de Fomento a la Gastronomía Nacional. Press Bulletin. https://www.gob.mx/sre/prensa/la-secretaria-de-relaciones-exteriores-presenta-nuevas-acciones-a-favor-de-la-politica-de-fomento-a-la-gastronomia-nacional?idiom=es.
 
UNESCO -Patrimonio Inmaterial-. (2010. La cocina tradicional mexicana: Una cultura comunitaria, ancestral y viva y el paradigma de Michoacán. Página de Internet UNESCO. https://ich.unesco.org/es/RL/la-cocina-tradicional-mexicana-una-cultura-comunitaria-ancestral-y-viva-y-el-paradigma-de-michoacan-00400?RL=00400
 
 

I returned from the 65th Convention of the International Studies Association that took place a few weeks ago in San Francisco. Participating in the convention gets better every time you do it. From my very anxious first-time attendance in Nashville in 2021 to the 2024 convention, it feels like light years of difference! So, it is worth considering attending constantly to get the most out of every convention. 
 
So, in San Francisco, even though I am a practitioner in a sea of academics, I did not feel uncomfortable as in previous experiences. In several panels, some welcomed the participation of practitioners.
 
Choosing which panels to attend was extremely difficult, as there were many great offerings. However, I want to highlight “Public Diplomacy in Other Words” and " Tech Diplomacy: Challenges and Opportunities.” 
 
Public Diplomacy in Other Words
 
The first one was organized by Kadir Jun Ayhan, a professor at Ewha Womans University and editor-in-chief of the Journal of Public Diplomacy. In a conscious effort to promote different perspectives from the Anglo-speaking world that dominates the literature on Public Diplomacy, Kadir led an effort to review articles published in various languages. 
 
Those who attended the session were fortunate to hear an analysis of public diplomacy articles published in Chinese, French, Russian, Turkish, and Indonesian. Luckily for those who could not participate in the session, the Journal of Public Diplomacy will publish a special edition with additional languages. So, make sure you look for it in the summer.
 
Looking into the production of articles about the topic in other languages is an excellent idea for anybody interested in public diplomacy. There is a greater need for diversity of perspectives. 
 
The effort faced a significant challenge because the term in some languages has different meanings, so they had to agree to focus on the term Public Diplomacy. Besides, in many instances, country brand and soft power are used interchangeably with public diplomacy, thus complicating the analysis. 
 
Tech Diplomacy: Challenges and Opportunities
 
The second panel, titled “Tech Diplomacy: Challenges and Opportunities,” had most of the panelists coming from UK universities, which was quite interesting for the different perspectives of US-based scholars. The panel showcased how much the term Tech Diplomacy has changed since Denmark designated the first Tech Ambassador in 2017. Check out my previous posts: digital-diplomacy-40-tech-diplomacy.html and why-denmark-sent-a-tech-ambassador-to-silicon-valley.html
 
The hype AI has caused, together with different efforts to regulate machine learning and the ever-growing concentration of power by tech companies, has changed the whole environment of tech diplomacy today. 
 
There was a meaningful discussion about how MFAs and other ministries deal with the issue. In some instances, they have established new departments and designs. It highlighted the existing divide between cyber and tech diplomacies and the competition these areas now have inside and outside the ministries. In most countries of the Global South, there are no known Tech Ambassadors or Tech Envoys except for Brazil, the great diplomat Eugenio V. Garcia. 
 
One of the reasons why I attended that panel was that Prof. Andre Barrinha from the University of Bath was the panel's co-chair.  He recently wrote a magnificent article titled “Cyber-diplomacy: The Emergence of Transient Field” (it is open access). 
 
In the article, in a succinct but exquisite way, Prof. Barrinha explains how some policies, such as cyber security, become part of the realm of diplomats. It is an excellent explanation of how actors engage in diplomatic functions without officially being diplomats. Diplomatization is the keyword here. I encourage to read it to everybody interested in understanding how certain topics and actors turn into a diplomatic world. 
 
Conventions are like the Oscars, where you can find all the film stars you love in one place. The difference is that most well-known academics are more approachable and always open to conversation.
 
The number of international participants was encouraging. Still, it was deplorable to see that some fantastic panels, such as “Passport Inequality: Research and Conference Travel Challenges for Global South Scholars” and the one on women in academia, did not have a quorum. I am sure other ways exist to get the word out on these critical topics.
 
To everybody´s delight, there was an array of psychedelic carpets to look at on the different floors, towers, and hotels where the convention was held. The free coffee at the exhibition´s coffee breaks was one of the best I had at a convention! Congratulations to the sponsors who gave us the necessary caffeine to withstand the whirlwind of activities. 
 
I am always optimistic, but the situation on the streets of San Francisco makes me wonder how, in one of the wealthiest metropolitan areas of the world, a few miles from the extraordinarily powerful and wealthy tech industry, the government and the people cannot find a solution for all the persons who are on the street fighting additions and homelessness. What will the future bring if this happens in San Francisco? Let´s think about the people in Gaza, Ukraine, Afghanistan, and other nations that have been left behind and nearly forgotten. The ply of the people of San Francisco calls for us to find a solution to the inequality problem in the world. Humanity cannot truly advance if people are hungry, homeless, and fighting all sorts of issues. 
 
Seeing more scholars from Mexico and other Latin American countries attending was encouraging. I was delighted to meet and talk with many great scholars from Latin America and Spain.
 
I hope to see you all in Chicago in 2025. 

Here is an updated version of the blog post Artificial Intelligence and Diplomacy resources, including Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, webpages, videos, studies, and articles. 
 
I added a new section about courses on AI and diplomacy. There is also information about using Machine Learning for teaching and learning.
 
Please share new ones in the comment section!
 
You can also read my blog posts about the subject here:

• Diplomacy and Technology: The future is happening now (January 18, 2023) 
• Digital Diplomacy 4.0: The Future is Now (May 2, 2023) 
• Digital Diplomacy 4.0: Tech Diplomacy (May 8, 2023) 
• Digital Diplomacy 4.0: The Basics of Artificial Intelligence (June 7, 2023) 
• Digital Diplomacy 4.0: How Artificial Intelligence is changing Diplomacy? (August 20, 2023)
• Diplomacy 4.0: The Rise of Artificial Intelligence as a Subject of Diplomatic Negotiations (November 20, 2023)
• Diplomacy 4.0 Navigating the AI Era: Geopolitics, Diplomacy, and the Power of Artificial Intelligence(December 28, 2023)

 
AI tools and application/experiments/usage


Diplo AI Writer @ DiploFoundation is a DiploFoundation artificial intelligence writer who publishes blog posts about the subject, including the DiploFoundation AI Diary.
 
HumAInism by DiploFoundation has some AI tools related to diplomacy and arts.
 
Can ChatGPT Explain Geopolitics? is an exercise to compare two essays and test if you can identify the one written by AI. It is published by Foreign Policy magazine.
 
Interactive webpage about the cost of AI in different languages (Tokenization fairness).
 
Webpages of research centers and institutions


Artificial Intelligence and Diplomacy by DiploFoundation. 

Artificial Intelligence by Digwatch (Geneva Internet Platform)

AI Now Institute.

Center for AI and Digital Policy

Center for the Advancement of Trustworthy AI

Deloitte AI Institute for Government

Global Index on Responsible AI
 
Global Partnership for AI

Institute for Ethics in AI at the University of Oxford 
 
MILA, Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute

OECD AI Observatory

Partnership on AI

The AI Index. Stanford University Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence 
 
Tech Policy Press.


UN-related sites


Road Map for Digital Cooperation  and its updated road map) 

Office of the Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology webpage

Global Digital Compact (May 2023)

High-Level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence and its Interim Report: Governing AI for Humanity (December 2023)
 
Summit of the Future

UNESCO´s Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence


Videos

Artificial Intelligence and Diplomacy Webinar. UNITAR and UOC. (2023, February 15).

AI and Diplomacy: Challenges and opportunities. UNITAR (2023, May 10)

Integrating Artificial Intelligence into an Embassy’s Public Diplomacy Workflows. Center on Public Diplomacy (2023, October 18) 
 
Technologies of Tomorrow: A Conversation with Dr. Eric Schmidt. Carnegie Endowment (2023, January 11).
 
DiploFoundation´s webdebates
 
Will AI take over diplomatic reporting? WebDebate #56. DiploFoundation (2023, February 7).

What role can AI play in diplomatic negotiation? WebDebate #57. DiploFoundation (2023, March 7).

How to Train Diplomats to Deal with AI and Data? WebDebate #58. DiploFoundation (2023, April 4).

What Can We Learn About AI Ethics and Governance from Non-Western Thought? WebDebate #59. DiploFoundation (2023, May 2).

AI for Peacemaking: new tools and opportunities for mediators. WebDebate #30. DiploFoundation (2019, June 19).

AI on the international agenda - where do we go from here? WebDebate #26. DiploFoundation (2018, December 4).


Studies and articles


Adebahr, C. (2023, October 11). Why AI will Change the Core of Foreign Policymaking. Global Policy.
 
Allen, G. (2022, October 11). Choking off China´s Access to the Future of AI. Center for Strategic & International Studies. 
 
Bjola, C. (2019, October 19). Diplomacy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Real Institute Elcano.

Bjola, C. (2020). Diplomacy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. EDA Working Paper. Emirates Diplomatic Academy.

Bjola, C. & Manor, I. (2023, April 25). ChatGPT: The end of diplomacy as we know it. Global Policy.

Bremmer, I. & Kupchan, C. (2022, January 3). Risk 2: Technopolar World. Top Risks 2022. p. 5-6. Euroasian Group.
 
Cesareo, S. & White, J. (2023, June 23). The Global AI Index. Tortoise Media. 
 
Cocking, S. (2016, September 19). Using algorithms to achieve digital diplomacy. A conversation with Elad Ratson, Director of R&D at Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Irish Tech News.

Corvalan, J. G. (2023). Propuesta de regulación y recomendaciones de inteligencia artificial en el mundo: sintesis de principales aspectos. Universidad de Buenos Aires. 
 
Cuéllar, M.-F. & Sheehan, M. (2023, June 19). AI Is Winning the AI Race. Foreign Policy.
 
Deloitte AI Institute for Government & Google Cloud. (2022). Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Modernize American Statecraft.

Davies, H., Mckernan, B., and Sabbagh, D. (2023, December 1). ´The Gospel´: how Israel uses AI to select bombing targets in Gaza. The Guardian.
 
Department of State. (2023, October). Enterprise. Artificial Intelligence Strategy FY2024-FY2025: Empowering Diplomacy thought Responsible AI.  
 
Dickow, M. and Jacob, D. (2018). The Global Debate on the Future of Artificial Intelligence. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik [SWV] Comment No. 23, p. 7.

Digwatch (n.d). GGE -Group of Governmental Experts- on lethal autonomous weapons systems. Digwatch.
 
Digwatch. (2019, February 5). Artificial intelligence and diplomacy: A new tool for diplomacy? EVENT REPORT. Digwatch. Geneva Internet Platform.

Digwatch. (2023, July 17). UN Security Council convenes to discuss AI risks. Digwatch. Geneva Internet Platform.

Digwatch (2023, December 25). UN General Assembly adopted resolution on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems or LAWS. Digwatch.
 
DiploFoundation. (2019). Mapping the challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence for the conduct of diplomacy. DiploFoundation and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland.

DiploFoundation. (2023, May 3). First full AI-reporting from the UN meeting. DiploFoundation blog.

DiploFoundation. (2023, May 3). AI-based report of United Nations Security Council debate marks start of a new era in multilateral diplomacy. DiploFoundation blog.

Elia Valori, G. (2023, July 8). Artificial Intelligence and the New World Order (1). Modern Diplomacy.

Elia Valori, G. (2023, July 30). AI and the new world order: Economy and war (2). Modern Diplomacy.

European Migration Network. (2022). The use of digitalisation and artificial intelligence in migration management: Joint EMN-OECD Inform.
 
Farrow, R. (2023, August 21). Elon Musk´s Shadow Rule. How the U.S. government came to rely on the tech billionaire—and is now struggling to rein him in. The New Yorker. 
 
Feás, E. (2023, February 2). La guerra tecnológica EEUU-China y sus efectos sobre Europa. Real Instituto Elcano. 
 
Galeotti, M. (2023, January 7). The age of AI diplomacy. The Spectator.

Giles, K. (2023, September 12). Tech giants hold huge sway in matters of war, life and death. That should concern us all. The Guardian. 
 
Government AI Readiness Index 2022.

Heaven, W. D. (2023, December 19). These six questions will dictate the future of generative AI. MIT Technology Review.
 
Henshall, W. (2023, Oct 23). What the U.N.’s AI Advising Group Will Do. Time. 

IBM Global AI Adoption Index 2022. 

Jacobs. S (2023, September 7). Time 100 Most Influential People on AI. Time.

Jafarova, L. (2023, August 1). Artificial Intelligence and Digital Diplomacy. E-International Relations.
 
Keohan, C. & Kralev, N. (2022, August 7). Want to Be a Diplomat? You Must Make it Past and A.I.’ Gateway’. Diplomatic Diary blog. Washington International Diplomatic Academy.

Kurbalija, J. (2017, May 9). The impact of big data on geopolitics, negotiations, and diplomacy. DiploFoundation Blog. (Updated August 7, 2022).
 
Kurbalija, J. (2023, May 1). Why might AI cause more ´lost in translation´ worldwide? DiploFoundation Blog.

Kurbajila, J. (2023, June 12). The case for bottom-up AI. Al Jazeera.

Kurbalija, J. (2023, August 1). What can Socrates teach us about AI and prompting? DiploFoundation Blog.

Kurbalija, J. (2023, November 8). How can we deal with AI risks? DiploFoundation Blog. 

Kurbalija, J. (2023, December 28). AI and Digital in 2023: From winter of excitement to autumn of clarity. DiploFoundation Blog
 
Laferrière, H. & McPherson, A. (2019, April 24). Augmented Decision-Making @ IRCC. Presentation to the Symposium on Algorithmic Government. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada.

Lazard Geopolitical Advisory. (2023, October). Geopolitics of Artificial Intelligence. 
 
Lederer, E. (2023, July 3). UN Council to hold first meeting on potential threats of artificial intelligence to global peace. AP News.

Liu, S. & Patton, D. (2023, December 22). China bans export of rare earths processing tech over national security. Reuters. 
 
Manor, I. (2023, February 21). The AI Moves In: ChatGPT’s Impact on Digital Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.

Manor, I. (2023, March 30). ChatGPT and the Future of Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.

Manor, I. (2023, April 4). ChatGPT and the Future of Diplomacy - Part 2. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.

Manor, I. (2023, April 18). ChatGPT and the Future of Diplomacy - Part 3. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.

Manor, I. (2023, June 15). AI’s Impact on Public Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.

Manor, I. (2023, June 27). The Many Races that will shape AI. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.

Manor, I. (2023, July 4). Real Fakes and the Future of Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.

Manor, I. (2023, August 15). Towards the Strategic Use of AI in Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy blog.

Marcus, G. (2023, November 23). Critical national security questions should not be decided unilaterally by unelected tech leaders. Marcus at AI.
 
Mahrenbach, E. (Ed.). (2023). Governing Artificial Intelligence. Global Policy
 
Maslej, N., Fattorini, l., Brynjolfsson, E., Etchemendy, J., Ligett, K., Lyons, T., Manyika, J., Ngo, H., Niebles, J. C., Parli, V., Shoham, Y., Wald, R., Clark, J., & Perrault, R. (2023, April). The Artificial Intelligence Index 2023 Annual Report. Stanford University Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence.
 
Matania, E. & Sommer, U. (2023, November 20). Tech titans, cyber commons and the war in Ukraine: An incipient shift in international relations. International Relations, 0 (0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178231211500
 
McCaffrey, C. R., Jones, O., Krumbmüller, F., & Bell, D. (2022; December). 2023 Geostrategic Outlook. Ernest and Young Parthenon.
 
McCaffrey, C. R., Jones, O., & Krumbmüller, F. (2023, December). 2024 Geostrategic Outlook. Ernest and Young Parthenon.
 
Morini Bianzino, N., Delarue. M.-L., Maher, S., Koene, A., Kummer, K., & Hassan-Szlamka, F. (2023, September 27). The Artificial Intelligence (AI) global regulatory landscape. Ernest and Young Global.
 
O´Neil, L (2023, August 12). The Truth in Tech: These Women Tried to Warn Us about AI. Rolling Stone.

Ortega, A. (2020, Diciembre 9). El pulso mundial por el dominio de los semiconductors. Real Instituto Elcano
 
Pavel, B., Ke, I., Spirtas, M., Ryseff, J., Sabbag, L., Smith, G., Scholl, K., & Lumpkin, D. (202) AI and Geopolitics: How Might AI Affect the Rise and Fall of Nations? Rand Corporation. 
 
Peirano, M. (2023, October 17). The double life of artificial intelligence. On automata, symbolic models, neural networks and machine learning: a brief history of AI. CCCB Lab.
 
Petrov, A., La Malfa, E., Torr, P. H.S., & Bibi, A. (2023, May 17). Language Model Tokenizers Introduce Unfairness Between Languages. ArXiv:2350.1542.

Ponzio, R., Nudhara Yusuf, N., Mallinson, F. & Shahrukh, M. (2023). Future of International Cooperation Report 2023. The Stimson Center, Doha Forum, and Global Institute for Strategic Research. 
 
René, G., Sayegh, P., Petersen, C., Pletts, C., Richardson, D., Stockburger, P., & Tanenblatt, E. (2023, July). The Future of Global AI Governance. Verses.  
 
Sauer, P. (2023, Sept. 8). Elon Musk ´committed evil´ with Starlink order, says Ukrainian official. The Guardian.
 
Schmidt, E. (2022). AI, Great Power Competition & National Security. Daedalus, 151(2), p.288-298. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01916.
 
Scolari, C.A. (2023, February 7). Artificial Intelligence: Half Wanting, Half Fearing 
How will new AI-based tools change the way we think and perceive the world? CCCB Lab.
 
Scott, B., Heumann, S., & Lorenz, P. (2018). Artificial Intelligence and Foreign Policy. Stiftung Neue Veranwortung.
 
Shahbaz, A., Funk, A., Brody, J., Vesteinsson, K., Baker, G., Grothe, C., Barak, M., Masinsin, M., Modi, R., & Sutterlin, E. (eds.) (2023). Freedom on the Net 2023: The Repressive Power of Artificial Intelligence. Freedom House.
 
Sheehan, M (2022, October 27). Biden’s Unprecedented Semiconductor Bet. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 
 
Stanford University. (n.d.). Global AI Vibrancy Tool. Who is leading the global AI race? Stanford University Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. 
 
Stanzel, V. & Voelsen, D. (2022). Diplomacy and Artificial Intelligence Reflections on Practical Assistance for Diplomatic Negotiations. SWP Research Paper.

Strachan, G. & Manor, I. (2023, July 14). ‘I can be a bastard too’- ChatGPT’s Real Contribution to Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.

Tacheva, J. and Ramasubramanian, S. (2023). AI Empire: Unraveling the interlocking systems of oppression in generative AI’s global order. Big Data and Society, 10(2), p. 1-13.  https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231219241
 
Tarar, Z. (2023, February 23). Analysis - Could AI change the business of diplomacy? The Diplomatic Pouch at Medium.

Tarar, Z. (2023, February 27). Analysis - Which AI tools should diplomats use today? The Diplomatic Pouch at Medium.

Tarar, Z. (2023, August 28). Analysis - Harnessing AI for diplomacy: Five tools to make your work easier. The Diplomatic Pouch at Medium.

Teleanu, S (2023, August 21). A journey of discovery: Using simulation and AI to teach and learn about digital governance. DiploFoundation Blog.

US Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy. (2023, June 14). The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Public Diplomacy: ACPD Official Meeting Minutes, June 14, 2023. 
 
Williams, A., Micali, M. & Gebru, T. (2022, October 23). The Exploited Labor Behind Artificial Intelligence. NOEMA.

Williams, R. & Otto, L. (2022). Artificial Intelligence as a Tool of Public Diplomacy: Communication between the United States and Iran. The Thinker 90(1) p. 28-40.

Voo, J., Hemani, I. & Cassidy, D. (2022, September). National Cyber Power Index 2022. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. 
 
Courses
 
Artificial Intelligence: Technology, Governance, and Policy Frameworks online course offered by DiploFoundation. Starts February 19, 2024. 
 
Artificial Intelligence for Beginners – A Curriculum offered by Microsoft. 
 
IA para todos (AI for everyone) offered by DeepLearning.AI at Coursera, thought by Andrew Ng. (some parts are offered in several languages). 
 
IBM: AI for Everyone: Master the Basics offered by edX. 
 
Machine learning and AI offered by Google (includes several courses). 
 
Information about using AI for teaching and learning

Mollick, E. (2022, December 13). How to…use AI to teach some of the hardest skills.  One Useful Thing blog.

Mollick, E. (2023, January 24). The practical guide to using AI to do stuff. One Useful Thing blog.

Mollick, E. (2023, March 17). Using AI to make teaching easier & more impactful. One Useful Thing blog.

Mollick, E. (2023, July 15). How to Use AI to Do Stuff: An Opinionated Guide. One Useful Thing blog.

Mollick, E. Video series on Practical AI for Teachers and Students. YouTube.

UNESCO. (2023). Technology in Education: A Tool on Whose Terms? Global Education Monitoring Report. UNESCO
 
 
DISCLAIMER: All views expressed on this blog are that of the author and do not represent the opinions of any other authority, agency, organization, employer or company.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) impacts every aspect of humanity, including the relationship between countries and the current world order. In this blog post, I write about how machine learning (ML) is transforming the international system where diplomacy takes place.
 
As seen in my previous posts, to better understand the impact of AI on diplomacy, DiploFoundation (2019) proposes to evaluate it from three different perspectives: 

• AI as a diplomatic tool that helps diplomats and MFAs perform their duties in areas such as consular affairs, public diplomacy, crisis management, and diplomatic negotiations.
• AI as a diplomatic topic, where the negotiations focus on how to regulate these applications best so they do not harm people and realize AI´s great potential. 
• The way AI affects “the environment in which diplomacy is practiced” (DiploFoundation, 2019, p. 6), e.g., the changes in the world’s geopolitics.

 
The most striking facts about how AI is influencing the diplomatic environment are two: 

1. The development of machine learning is being done mostly by private companies, not public entities, which has profound implications for governments and geopolitics. 
2. The huge concentration of this technology in only two countries, the United States and China, and their increasing rivalry. 

 
These two elements significantly affect the balance of power in military and economic terms (DiploFoundation, 2019, p. 6), which is transforming the current geopolitical landscape. Let´s start discussing the increasing international role of the private sector, especially the tech giants (Alibaba, Alphabet -Google-, Amazon, Apple, Baidu, Meta -Facebook-, Microsoft, and Tencent).

 The big question regarding AI is whether it will benefit the majority of humanity or further concentrate power and enhance inequality. 
 
Do not forget to read some other posts about the subject: 
 

• Diplomacy and Technology: The future is happening now (January 18, 2023) 
• Digital Diplomacy 4.0: The Future is Now (May 2, 2023) 
• Digital Diplomacy 4.0: Tech Diplomacy (May 8, 2023)
• Digital Diplomacy 4.0: The Basics of Artificial Intelligence (June 7, 2023)
• Digital Diplomacy 4.0: How Artificial Intelligence is Changing Diplomacy? (August 20, 2023)
• Diplomacy 4.0: The Rise of Artificial Intelligence as a Subject of Diplomatic Negotiations (November 20, 2023)

 
Besides, I have curated a list of resources on AI and Diplomacy, which is a work in progress: 

• Diplomacy 4.0: Resources on Diplomacy and Artificial Intelligence

 
References
 
Allen, G. (2022, October 11). Choking off China´s Access to the Future of AI. Center for Strategic & International Studies. 
Bremmer, I. & Kupchan, C. (2022, January 3). Risk 2: Technopolar World. Top Risks 2022. p. 5-6. Euroasian Group.
Cesareo, S. & White, J. (2023, June 23). The Global AI Index. Tortoise Media. 
Cuéllar, M.-F. & Sheehan, M. (2023, June 19). AI Is Winning the AI Race. Foreign Policy. 
Davies, H., Mckernan, B., and Sabbagh, D. (2023, December 1). ´The Gospel´: how Israel uses AI to select bombing targets in Gaza. The Guardian. 
Digwatch (n.d). GGE -Group of Governmental Experts- on lethal autonomous weapons systems. Digwatch.
Digwatch (2023, December 25). UN General Assembly adopted resolution on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems or LAWS. Digwatch.
DiploFoundation. (2019). Mapping the challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence for the conduct of diplomacy. DiploFoundation and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland.
Farrow, R. (2023, August 21). Elon Musk´s Shadow Rule. How the U.S. government came to rely on the tech billionaire—and is now struggling to rein him in. The New Yorker. 
Giles, K. (2023, September 12). Tech giants hold huge sway in matters of war, life and death. That should concern us all. The Guardian. 
Heaven, W. D. (2023, December 19). These six questions will dictate the future of generative AI. MIT Technology Review.
Jafarova, L. (2023, August 1). Artificial Intelligence and Digital Diplomacy. E-International Relations.
Kurbalija, J. (2017, May 9). The impact of big data on geopolitics, negotiations, and diplomacy. DiploFoundation Blog. (Updated August 7, 2022).
Lazard Geopolitical Advisory. (2023, October). Geopolitics of Artificial Intelligence. 
Liu, S. & Patton, D. (2023, December 22). China bans export of rare earths processing tech over national security. Reuters.
McCaffrey, C. R., Jones, O., Krumbmüller, F., & Bell, D. (2022, December). 2023 Geostrategic Outlook. Ernest and Young Parthenon.
McCaffrey, C. R., Jones, O., & Krumbmüller, F. (2023, December). 2024 Geostrategic Outlook. Ernest and Young Parthenon.
Marcus, G. (2023, November 23). Critical national security questions should not be decided unilaterally by unelected tech leaders. Marcus at AI. 
Maslej, N., Fattorini, l., Brynjolfsson, E., Etchemendy, J., Ligett, K., Lyons, T., Manyika, J., Ngo, H., Niebles, J. C., Parli, V., Shoham, Y., Wald, R., Clark, J., & Perrault, R. (2023, April). The Artificial Intelligence Index 2023 Annual Report. Stanford University Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence.
Matania, E. & Sommer, U. (2023, November 20). Tech titans, cyber commons and the war in Ukraine: An incipient shift in international relations. International Relations, 0 (0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178231211500.
Morini Bianzino, N., Delarue. M.-L., Maher, S., Koene, A., Kummer, K., & Hassan-Szlamka, F. (2023, September 27). The Artificial Intelligence (AI) global regulatory landscape. Ernest and Young Global.
Pavel, B., Ke, I., Spirtas, M., Ryseff, J., Sabbag, L., Smith, G., Scholl, K., & Lumpkin, D. (2022) AI and Geopolitics: How Might AI Affect the Rise and Fall of Nations? Rand Corporation. 
Sauer, P. (2023, Sept. 8). Elon Musk ´committed evil´ with Starlink order, says Ukrainian official. The Guardian.
Schmidt, E. (2022). AI, Great Power Competition & National Security. Daedalus, 151(2), p.288-298. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01916.
Shahbaz, A., Funk, A., Brody, J., Vesteinsson, K., Baker, G., Grothe, C., Barak, M., Masinsin, M., Modi, R., & Sutterlin, E. (eds.). (2023). Freedom on the Net 2023: The Repressive Power of Artificial Intelligence. Freedom House.
Sheehan, M (2022, October 27). Biden’s Unprecedented Semiconductor Bet. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 
Stanford University. (n.d.). Global AI Vibrancy Tool. Who is leading the global AI race? Stanford University Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. 
Tacheva, J. and Ramasubramanian, S. (2023). AI Empire: Unraveling the interlocking systems of oppression in generative AI’s global order. Big Data and Society, 10(2), p. 1-13.  https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231219241
Voo, J., Hemani, I. & Cassidy, D. (2022, September). National Cyber Power Index 2022. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. 
 
 
DISCLAIMER: All views expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not represent the opinions of any other authority, agency, organization, employer or company.

As the Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution continues, governments and international organizations are rapidly expanding diplomatic negotiations on the subject. In this blog post, I continue analyzing Artificial Intelligence in diplomacy, now focusing on AI as a subject of Diplomacy. 
 
As in my previous post, Diplomacy 4.0: How Artificial Intelligence in Changing Diplomacy? diplomacy-40-how-artificial-intelligence-is-changing-diplomacy.html, I will be using DiploFoundation´s perspective on how AI influences diplomacy (DiploFoundation, 2019, p. 14-15), which divides them into three: a) AI as a diplomatic tool; b) AI as a topic of diplomacy, and c) the consequences of AI on the international system.
 
First, let's say that it is tough to follow up on the discussion on AI, as most international organizations and other multilateral mechanisms analyze the topic from different perspectives. However, the concerns about AI did not appear with the launching of ChatGPT a year ago. In many multilateral forums, AI has been discussed for quite some time.
 
AI´s impact on all fronts makes it a theme for discussion in every single arena, from ethics and biases to human rights and democracy, including data protection and economic development. Kurbalija (2023, November 10) indicates that AI governance needs to be seen as different layers, starting from the hardware, including the chips used to power AI systems, followed by data, algorithms, and apps. This division is useful as it helps focus on specific aspects of each layer.
 
Many organizations see AI as a great tool to help countries achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. In general, the development of AI has significant policy implications in four main areas: social and economic, safety and security, human rights, and ethical concerns (Digwatch, n.d., Artificial Intelligence).
 
Some recent examples of AI as an issue for diplomacy are:

• AI Safety Summit, hosted by the UK (November 2023).  
• The G7 Hiroshima AI Process (October 2023). 
• The UN Security Council meeting on AI (July 18, 2023). 
• AI for Good Summit, organized by the International Telecommunications Union (July 2023).
• The G20 Ministerial Statement on Trade and Digital Economy (June 2019).

 
In the following section, there is a brief review of some of the most important activities related to AI as a topic of diplomacy. For an in-depth view, make sure you visit AI’s Digwatch webpage.
 
UNESCO’s Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. 
 
In November 2021, all member states of UNESCO (193 countries) adopted the Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. It was a significant milestone regarding AI because rarely all 193 countries agreed on such a controversial topic, even with no binding guidelines. 
 
Besides, it is a very influential document as it is the only one of such documents or efforts. “What makes the Recommendation exceptionally applicable are its extensive Policy Action Areas, which allow policymakers to translate the core values and principles into action with respect to data governance, environment and ecosystems, gender, education and research, and health and social wellbeing, among many other spheres” (UNESCO, n.d.).
 
UN Secretary-General efforts on AI.
 
The UN and its organs have been working on several fronts to promote greater international collaboration in digital technology. Besides UNESCO, the Secretary-General has been promoting several actions in preparation for the Summit of the Future in September 2024.
 
Here are some of the highlights of the different efforts:

• Road Map for Digital Cooperation (June 2020).
• Creation of the Office of the Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology UN Envoy on Technology(June 2021).
• Proposal of negotiating the Global Digital Compact (September 2021).
• Establishment of the UN High-Level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence (October 2023).
• Celebration of the Summit of the Future (September 2024).

 
The UN Secretary-General Envoy on Technology.
 
After a year after establishing the Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology, in June 2022, António Guterres named Amandeep Singh Gill the first UN Secretary-General Envoy on Technology. This is significant because the office “coordinates the implementation of the Secretary-General’s Roadmap on Digital Cooperation and will advance work towards the Global Digital Compact” (Office of the Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology, n.d.)
 
The UN High-Level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence
 
In October 2023, “UN Secretary-General António Guterres unveiled a new advisory body dedicated to developing consensus around the risks posed by artificial intelligence and how international cooperation can help meet those challenges” (Henshall, 2023).
 
The High-Level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence has 38 members and met for the first time in November 2023. “The Body will offer diverse perspectives and options on how AI can be governed for the common good, aligning internationally interoperable governance with human rights and the Sustainable Development Goals.” (Office of the Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology, n.d.)
 
The Council of Europe’s Convention on AI and Human Rights. 
 
This is an important negotiation, as it could be the first international treaty on the subject. The Council of Europe (CoE) established the Committee on Artificial Intelligence in 2021 with the goal of “elaborating a legal instrument on the development, design, and application of artificial intelligence (AI) systems based on the CoE’s standards on human rights, democracy and the rule of law, and conducive to innovation” (Digwatch, n.d., Convention on AI and human rights).
 
European Union Artificial Intelligence Act.
 
The European Commission proposed the Artificial Intelligence Act as part of the European Union's digital strategy, which already includes the General Data Protection Regulation (DGPR) (2018) and the Digital Market Act(2022). “Once approved, these [AI regulations] will be the world’s first rules on AI” (European Parliament, 2023a).
 
The EU standpoint is that “AI systems that can be used in different applications are analysed and classified according to the risk they pose to users. The different risk levels will mean more or less regulation” (EuropeanParliament, 2023a).
 
In June 2023, the “European Parliament adopted its negotiating position on the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act … ahead of talks with EU member states on the final shape of the law” (European Parliament, 2023b). 
 
The negotiations between member states have advanced. However, recently, there were some disagreements that might delay the approval, which was expected as early as December.
 
AI governance is at the core of diplomatic negotiations. 
 
Because AI´s impact on the world is transformational, all diplomatic endeavors center on its governance/regulations. “When debates on AI governance first emerged, one overarching question was whether AI-related challenges (in areas such as safety, privacy, and ethics) call for new legal and regulatory frameworks, or whether existing ones could be adapted to also cover AI. Applying and adapting existing regulation was seen by many as the most suitable approach. But, as AI innovation accelerated and applications became more and more pervasive, AI-specific governance and regulatory initiatives started emerging at national, regional, and international levels” (Digwatch, n.d., Artificial Intelligence).
 
As mentioned above, the UN Secretary-General has been on the lead in the possible establishment of a new intergovernmental body that oversees AI. The brand-new Advisory Body has the purpose of discussing possible alternatives. 
 
At the national level, many countries already issued some guidelines or regulations about AI. To learn more about each country´s effort, check out the Government AI Readiness Index 2022 or the IBM Global AI Adoption Index 2022.
 
One of the main recommendations of the Future of International Cooperation Report 2023 is the creation of an Artificial Intelligence international agency that “would serve to: 

1. Improve visibility, advocacy, and resource mobilization for global AI regulatory efforts; 
2. provide thought leadership on General Assembly and Security Council AI and cyber technology-related initiatives and agreements; 
3. monitor, evaluate, and report on AI industry safeguards in compliance with an agreed international regulatory framework; 
4. enhance coordination across Member States and regional bodies to leverage AI’s positive development applications; and 
5. coordinate transnationally across initiatives and frameworks on AI governance to support knowledge-sharing of best practices and lessons learnt. 

The Agency should be supported by an expert Intergovernmental Cyber and AI Panel, modeled on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change” (Ponzio, R. et al., 2023, p. 9).
 
Several authors, including Manor (2023) and Kurbalija (2023, November 8), indicate that most of the attention on AI risks is focused on long-term issues such as existential threats to humanity. However, more immediate consequences of machine learning systems need to be confronted, such as biases, accessibility, and others. Governments, international organizations, companies, and civil society should comprehensively address short-, medium-, and long-term AI risks to tackle them better (Kurbalija, 2023, November 8).
 
The calls to create an AI international body are growing. The most often cited examples are the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). However, after explaining the difficulties of setting up a new international organization, Roberts suggests that the “discussion should move away from what an idealised institution could look like, towards how existing initiatives can realistically be built upon to bring about positive change” (2023). 
 
Furthermore, he proposes a decentralized approach, similar to the Paris Accord and welcomes the creation of the UN Advisory Body on AI that “provides a valuable outlet for progressing discussions on strengthening international coordination; for instance, through mapping which institutions are currently fulfilling international AI governance functions and providing recommendations for how gaps can be filled and duplication lessened” (Roberts, 2023).
 
The recently held AI Safety Summit resulted in “a joint commitment by twenty-eight governments and leading AI companies subjecting advanced AI models to a battery of safety tests before release and a major push to support regular, scientist-led assessments of AI capabilities and safety risks” (Cuellar, 2023).
 
In the next eleven months, until the Summit of Future, there will be extensive discussion on multiple venues regarding AI governance. The fact that major countries agreed to the Bletchley Declaration gives some hope to find a way to reach an agreement on the topic. The obstacles are significant, and the differences are pronounced. The geopolitical competition between China and the US and the existing worldwide turmoil are challenges facing negotiators. 
 
The consequences of AI on the international system, especially on geopolitics, could be the defining element of reaching an agreement or not. The next blog post will discuss the third perspective on how to study AI´s influence on diplomacy. 
 
Note: Many more organizations and topics are being discussed on AI at the international level, such as Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS), so only a few topics were covered in this blog post. 
 
References
 
Cuellar, M.F. (2023, November 9). The UK AI Safety Summit Opened a New Chapter in AI Diplomacy. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 
Digwatch. (n.d.). Artificial Intelligence. Digwatch.
Digwatch. (n.d.). Convention on AI and human rights (CoE process). Digwatch.
DiploFoundation. (2019). Mapping the challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence for the conduct of diplomacy. DiploFoundation and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland.
European Parliament. (2023a, June 14). EU AI Act: first regulation on artificial intelligence. EuropeanParliament News.
European Parliament. (2023b, June 14). MEPs ready to negotiate first-ever rules for safe and transparent AI. European Parliament News.
Henshall, W. (2023, Oct 23). What the U.N.’s AI Advising Group Will Do. Time. 
Kurbalija, J. (2023, November 8). How can we deal with AI risks? DiploFoundation Blog. 
Kurbalija, J. (2023, November 10). Layers of AI governance [Byte-sized Insights] #5. DiploFoundation. [Video].
Manor, I. (2023, June 6). Shock and Awe: How AI is Sidestepping Regulation. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.
Office of the Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology. (n.d.). Office of the Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology webpage.
Office of the Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology. (n.d.). High-Level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence. Office of the Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology webpage.
Ponzio, R., Nudhara Yusuf, N., Mallinson, F. & Shahrukh, M. (2023). Future of International Cooperation Report 2023. The Stimson Center, Doha Forum, and Global Institute for Strategic Research.
Roberts, H. (2023, August 11). Opinion – A New International AI Body Is No Panacea. E-International Relations.
UNESCO. (n.d). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. UNESCO webpage. 
 
 
Are you interested in AI and diplomacy? Check out my blog post about Resources on Diplomacy and Artificial Intelligence diplomacy-40-resources-on-diplomacy-and-artificial-intelligence.html
 
DISCLAIMER: All views expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not represent the opinions of any other authority, agency, organization, employer or company.
 
 

Here is an updated version of Artificial Intelligence and Diplomacy resources, including AI tools, webpages, videos, studies, and articles. In the end, there is some information about using AI for teaching and learning. 
 
Please share new ones in the comment section!
 
You can also read my blog posts about the subject here:

• Diplomacy and Technology: The future is happening now (January 18, 2023) diplomacy-and-technology-the-future-is-happening-now.html
• Digital Diplomacy 4.0: The Future is Now (May 2, 2023) digital-diplomacy-40-the-future-is-now.html
• Digital Diplomacy 4.0: Tech Diplomacy (May 8, 2023) digital-diplomacy-40-tech-diplomacy.html
• Digital Diplomacy 4.0: The Basics of Artificial Intelligence (June 7, 2023) digital-diplomacy-40-the-basics-of-artificial-intelligence.html
• Diplomacy 4.0: How Artificial Intelligence is Changing Diplomacy?  (August 20, 2023) diplomacy-40-how-artificial-intelligence-is-changing-diplomacy.html

 

AI tools and application/experiments/usage
 
Diplo AI Writer @ DiploFoundation is a DiploFoundation artificial intelligence writer who publishes blog posts about the subject, including the DiploFoundation AI Diary. 
 
HumAInism by DiploFoundation has some AI tools related to diplomacy and arts.
 
Can ChatGPT Explain Geopolitics? is an exercise to compare two essays and test if you can identify the one written by AI. It is published by Foreign Policy magazine.
 
Interactive webpage about the cost of AI in different languages (Tokenization fairness).
 

Webpages of research centers and institutions
 
Artificial Intelligence and Diplomacy by DiploFoundation. 
 
Artificial Intelligence by Digwatch (Geneva Internet Platform)
 
AI Now Institute.
 
Center for AI and Digital Policy
 
Center for the Advancement of Trustworthy AI
 
Deloitte AI Institute for Government
 
Global Partnership for AI.
 
MILA, Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute.
 
OECD AI Observatory.
 
Partnership on AI
 
Tech Policy Press.
 
UN-related sites:
 
Road Map for Digital Cooperation  and its updated road map) 
Office of the Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology webpage.
Global Digital Compact (May 2023, 
High-Level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence
Summit of the Future
UNESCO´s Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.
 

Videos
 
Artificial Intelligence and Diplomacy Webinar. UNITAR and UOC. (2023, February 15).
 
AI and Diplomacy: Challenges and opportunities. UNITAR (2023, May 10)
 
Will AI take over diplomatic reporting? WebDebate #56. DiploFoundation (2023, February 7).
 
What role can AI play in diplomatic negotiation? WebDebate #57. DiploFoundation (2023, March 7).
 
How to Train Diplomats to Deal with AI and Data? WebDebate #58. DiploFoundation (2023, April 4).
 
What Can We Learn About AI Ethics and Governance from Non-Western Thought? WebDebate #59. DiploFoundation (2023, May 2).
 
AI for Peacemaking: new tools and opportunities for mediators. WebDebate #30. DiploFoundation (2019, June 19).

AI on the international agenda - where do we go from here? WebDebate #26. DiploFoundation (2018, December 4).
 

Studies and articles
 
Bjola, C. (2019, October 19). Diplomacy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Real Institute Elcano.
 
Bjola, C. (2020). Diplomacy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. EDA Working Paper. Emirates Diplomatic Academy.
 
Bjola, C. & Manor, I. (2023, April 25). ChatGPT: The end of diplomacy as we know it. Global Policy.
 
Cocking, S. (2016, September 19). Using algorithms to achieve digital diplomacy. A conversation with Elad Ratson, Director of R&D at Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Irish Tech News.
 
Deloitte AI Institute for Government & Google Cloud. (2022). Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Modernize American Statecraft.
 
Dickow, M. and Jacob, D. (2018). The Global Debate on the Future of Artificial Intelligence. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik [SWV] Comment No. 23, p. 7.
 
Digwatch. (2019, February 5). Artificial intelligence and diplomacy: A new tool for diplomacy? EVENT REPORT. Digwatch. Geneva Internet Platform.
 
Digwatch. (2023, July 17). UN Security Council convenes to discuss AI risks. Digwatch. Geneva Internet Platform.
 
DiploFoundation. (2019). Mapping the challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence for the conduct of diplomacy. DiploFoundation and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland.
 
DiploFoundation. (2023, May 3). First full AI-reporting from the UN meeting. DiploFoundation blog.
 
DiploFoundation. (2023, May 3). AI-based report of United Nations Security Council debate marks start of a new era in multilateral diplomacy. DiploFoundation blog.
 
Elia Valori, G. (2023, July 8). Artificial Intelligence and the New World Order (1). Modern Diplomacy.
 
Elia Valori, G. (2023, July 30). AI and the new world order: Economy and war (2). Modern Diplomacy.
 
European Migration Network. (2022). The use of digitalisation and artificial intelligence in migration management: Joint EMN-OECD Inform.
 
Galeotti, M. (2023, January 7). The age of AI diplomacy. The Spectator.
 
Government AI Readiness Index 2022.
 
Henshall, W. (2023, Oct 23). What the U.N.’s AI Advising Group Will Do. Time. 
 
IBM Global AI Adoption Index 2022. 
 
Jacobs. S (2023, September 7). Time 100 Most Influential People on AI. Time.
 
Keohan, C. & Kralev, N. (2022, August 7). Want to Be a Diplomat? You Must Make it Past and A.I.’ Gateway’. Diplomatic Diary blog. Washington International Diplomatic Academy.
 
Kurbalija, J. (2023, May 1). Why might AI cause more ´lost in translation´ worldwide? DiploFoundation Blog.
 
Kurbajila, J. (2023, June 12). The case for bottom-up AI. Al Jazeera.
 
Kurbalija, J. (2023, August 1). What can Socrates teach us about AI and prompting? DiploFoundation Blog.
 
Kurbalija, J. (2023, November 8). How can we deal with AI risks? DiploFoundation Blog. 
 
Laferrière, H. & McPherson, A. (2019, April 24). Augmented Decision-Making @ IRCC. Presentation to the Symposium on Algorithmic Government. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada.
 
Lederer, E. (2023, July 3). UN Council to hold first meeting on potential threats of artificial intelligence to global peace. AP News.
 
Manor, I. (2023, February 21). The AI Moves In: ChatGPT’s Impact on Digital Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.
 
Manor, I. (2023, March 30). ChatGPT and the Future of Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.
 
Manor, I. (2023, April 4). ChatGPT and the Future of Diplomacy - Part 2. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.
 
Manor, I. (2023, April 18). ChatGPT and the Future of Diplomacy - Part 3. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.
 
Manor, I. (2023, June 15). AI’s Impact on Public Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.
 
Manor, I. (2023, June 27). The Many Races that will shape AI. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.
 
Manor, I. (2023, July 4). Real Fakes and the Future of Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.
 
Manor, I. (2023, August 15). Towards the Strategic Use of AI in Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy blog.
 
O´Neil, L (2023, August 12). The Truth in Tech: These Women Tried to Warn Us about AI. Rolling Stone.
 
Petrov, A., La Malfa, E., Torr, P. H.S., & Bibi, A. (2023, May 17). Language Model Tokenizers Introduce Unfairness Between Languages. ArXiv:2350.1542.
 
Ponzio, R., Nudhara Yusuf, N., Mallinson, F. & Shahrukh, M. (2023). Future of International Cooperation Report 2023. The Stimson Center, Doha Forum, and Global Institute for Strategic Research.
 
Scott, B., Heumann, S., & Lorenz, P. (2018). Artificial Intelligence and Foreign Policy. Stiftung Neue Veranwortung.
 
Stanzel, V. & Voelsen, D. (2022). Diplomacy and Artificial Intelligence Reflections on Practical Assistance for Diplomatic Negotiations. SWP Research Paper.
 
Strachan, G. & Manor, I. (2023, July 14). ‘I can be a bastard too’- ChatGPT’s Real Contribution to Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.
 
Tarar, Z. (2023, February 23). Analysis - Could AI change the business of diplomacy? The Diplomatic Pouch at Medium.
 
Tarar, Z. (2023, February 27). Analysis - Which AI tools should diplomats use today? The Diplomatic Pouch at Medium.
 
Tarar, Z. (2023, August 28). Analysis - Harnessing AI for diplomacy: Five tools to make your work easier. The Diplomatic Pouch at Medium.
 
Teleanu, S (2023, August 21). A journey of discovery: Using simulation and AI to teach and learn about digital governance. DiploFoundation Blog.
 
Williams, A., Micali, M. & Gebru, T. (2022, October 23). The Exploited Labor Behind Artificial Intelligence. NOEMA.
 
Williams, R. & Otto, L. (2022). Artificial Intelligence as a Tool of Public Diplomacy: Communication between the United States and Iran. The Thinker 90(1) p. 28-40.
 

Information about using AI for teaching and learning.
 
Mollick, E. (2022, December 13). How to…use AI to teach some of the hardest skills.  One Useful Thing blog.
 
Mollick, E. (2023, January 24). The practical guide to using AI to do stuff. One Useful Thing blog.
 
Mollick, E. (2023, March 17). Using AI to make teaching easier & more impactful. One Useful Thing blog.
 
Mollick, E. (2023, July 15). How to Use AI to Do Stuff: An Opinionated Guide. One Useful Thing blog.
 
Mollick, E. Video series on Practical AI for Teachers and Students. YouTube.
 

​DISCLAIMER: All views expressed on this blog are that of the author and do not represent the opinions of any other authority, agency, organization, employer or company.

 
In January 2023, I visited a country in the Middle East. It has been a while since I got so excited about a trip because it was my first time to that area of the planet. The region, particularly the Gulf States, has recently been in the world spotlight as the host of significant events such as the Dubai Expo 2020 and the Qatar Men´s World Cup 2022. 
 
Going to the region felt like my first trip to Asia-Pacific 31 years ago. Back then, most of Southeast Asia was developing rapidly and was attracting the world´s attention as the so-called Asian Tigers or NICs (New Industrialized Economies, referring to South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore). At that time, constructions were everywhere, and some innovative schemes were being developed in the region. APEC was the hottest informal multilateral organization. Besides, China was not yet the global power it is today, as it was still working on its economic reforms but was catching up fast.
 
It is interesting that some regions get attention at a certain point. Japan was the talk of the town in the late 1980s, as they bought many U.S. companies. For Latin America, its moment happened back in the 1960s, when the region was growing fast. Mexico was called one of Latin America's miracles and even hosted the Olympic Games (1968) and the Men´s Soccer World Cup (1970) back-to-back. Sadly, today, Latin America is losing ground on the world stage.
 
Humans like to build things, which is a perfect way to show off. Just look at Egypt’s pyramids or New York´s Empire State skyscraper so the world notices when countries erect attention-grabbing buildings. In the late 1990s, Malaysia finished the Petronas Twin Towers, the tallest building in the world back then, which was later overpassed by the Taipei 101 building. In recent years, the Gulf States have been catching up, developing massive infrastructure projects and impressive buildings such as the Burj Khalifa, the tallest building in the world today. Some of the region´s airlines are now trendsetters, just like Asian carriers two decades ago.
 
You know when a region has become fashionable when you start to see locally produced shows on TV and streaming platforms. One example is Netflix´s Dubai Bling. I think this is a good thing because people worldwide, particularly from the Global South, can see a homegrown perspective rather than a Western one. This has been a problem for Mexico for the longest time, as we typically are known from what Hollywood movies show or U.S. media networks. Read more about Mexico´s image abroad in the blog post titled Broken funhouse mirror: Mexico´s image and reputation abroad. 
 
For many people around the globe, the Islamic world is mostly unknown, and the few things we know about it come from Western sources. For example, in history classes, we all learned how Europe contained the Muslim invasion during the Middle Ages and that later, they took over the whole region, especially after the disappearance of the Ottoman Empire. We also know that they had great mathematical thinkers, such as Muhammad ibn Musa Al-Khwarizmi, who were the basis of today´s computer systems. In my house, Las mil y una noches stories (Arabian Nights in English) were very popular when we were growing up. But that was it, besides the constant appearances of the region in the news, usually referring to violence, political and economic strive, and geopolitical competition.
 
In Mexico, the Muslim population is minimal, so there are few opportunities to meet them and learn directly from them about their vibrant culture. In my case, it was not until I studied for a master's degree in Southeast Asia that I met very good friends from the Middle East. Later, I lived in Malaysia, where I always enjoyed the call to pray from my apartment´s nearby Mosque. While studying for my GMAP master´s degree, we analyzed the region thoroughly, as the U.S. was in the midst of the consequences of the 2003 Iraq invasion, and security issues were paramount. 
 
I enjoyed visiting a part of the Middle East, learning about the region’s history, meeting amazing people, and eating scrumptious dishes. I had the opportunity to visit an exemplary museum showcasing human art's history from a broad perspective. Most of its contents are not paintings, as in most Western museums, but plenty of figurines, masks, jewelry, and marble, rock, and bronze sculptures. It was eye-opening to see that the history of human civilizations does not start with the Greeks. The Middle East has some of the oldest art pieces in the world. Including works from China and India expose a much broader vision of the development of art worldwide. This is one of the goals of the Global South movement in International Relations.
 
While there, Twitter, now X, suggested Bayt Al Fann´s account showcasing Islamic art and culture. Just look at it to experience some fantastic works of art that most do not know existed. What a different perspective from most of the daily news and images about the region we see in the media!
 
Traveling allows you to experience places without any filters; thus, if you want to learn more about the world today, I encourage you to travel, even to your neighboring town.
 
DISCLAIMER: All views expressed on this blog are that of the author and do not represent the opinions of any other authority, agency, organization, employer or company.
 
 
 

Today is an exceptional day for me. Twenty-five years ago, I joined the Foreign Service.
 
It has been an extraordinary journey with ups and downs and amazing experiences, from meeting heads of state and representing Mexico in our Independence Day celebrations to organizing football tournaments for children and writing thousands of documents.
 
One of the most significant rewards of my diplomatic career has been working with my colleagues, especially from the 15th generation of the diplomatic academy. Cheers to the members of my chat groups Vamos Mexico, Core Group, and Consejeros. Besides, I have been fortunate to have great bosses from whom I learned a lot throughout these years.
 
I also had the unique opportunity to assist Mexicans abroad in distress in horrendous circumstances, including terrorist attacks, hurricanes and earthquakes, domestic violence, and more. Consular protection is where foreign policy meets people; I cherished my work in that department.
 
While overseas, I had the opportunity to work for the Mexican community, which was a humbling experience. Mexicans abroad are the hardest-working people anywhere and some of the most patriotic people. Celebrating with them civic ceremonies and their hometowns' Saint's feast day are some of the highlights of my diplomatic career. Special thanks to the people of El Refugio, Jalisco; Sombrerete, Zacatecas; Axochiapan, Morelos; San Agustin Yaterani, Oaxaca; Las Margaritas, Chiapas; and many more towns across Mexico.
 
I joined the foreign service during the tenure of the first female Minister of Foreign Affairs, and I am thrilled that we have our fourth female today. However, there is still much to do to fully attain gender equality and inclusion of other groups. 
 
The world has changed a lot since 1998. The digital revolution is pushing forward, regardless of its impact on society, government, and people. With the arrival of Generative AI, we are beginning another disruptive era.
 
Diplomacy has also moved forward. Terms such as Tech and Digital diplomacy did not exist when I started my diplomatic career. Besides, while public diplomacy was disappearing in the US, it was exploding elsewhere, giving a new push for studying diplomacy. In recent years, there has been a boom in diplomatic studies, bringing perspectives from the Global South, thus moving slowly away from a Western-centric lens. 
 
Consular diplomacy as a field of study did not exist in 1998. However, the combination of lower transportation costs, the information and communications technology revolution, and the socialization and societization of diplomacy gave way to the rise of consular affairs as a priority to not only the ministries of foreign affairs but also politicians, the media, and the public. In my blog post, Consular Diplomacy bibliography LINK, you can find a list of books, essays, and documents on the subject.
 
 
Nowadays, my focus is learning about the impact of technology, especially artificial intelligence. You can check out my series on Diplomacy 4.0, including the following posts:

• Diplomacy and Technology: The future is happening now·  
  
• Digital Diplomacy 4.0: The Future is Now·    
  
• Digital Diplomacy 4.0: Tech Diplomacy·       
  
• Digital Diplomacy 4.0: The Basics of Artificial Intelligence
• Diplomacy 4.0: How Artificial Intelligence is Changing Diplomacy?

 
I am looking forward to what my diplomatic career will take me next, but I am always ready to learn new things. 

DISCLAIMER: All views expressed on this blog are that of the author and do not represent the opinions of any other authority, agency, organization, employer or company.

 
Today is the third anniversary of my blog. As I mentioned in the second-anniversary blog post, it has been a roller-coaster ride with tremendous ups and a few downs.
 
Three years does not seem a lot of time, but many things have changed, for better or worse. I started the blog in September 2020, when the world was closed due to the pandemic. However, significant efforts were made to find a vaccine, thus allowing the world to reopen slowly, even after a series of surges generated by new variants of the virus.
 
For a few years, the world, especially the great powers, has slowly turned economic, financial, data, and people exchanges into geopolitical weapons. To learn more, check out the great work The Power Atlas: Seven battlegrounds of a networked world. Some scholars state that a new era of deglobalization is moving forward as more countries build barriers to the free flow of trade, data, services, and people. The securitization of the economy, particularly semiconductors, critical minerals, and digital technology, is impacting the whole planet.
 
The disruption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the exponential race to launch the system that could be the winner has turned the world upside down. There is not a day when a new large language model is not released that supposedly will outperform all others. Students and teachers struggle to find the right approach to using AI, while many workers feel that machine learning will take their jobs and livelihoods. Even though many have asked to pause the development of AI, the race is growing exponentially while governments, societies, and people are trying to make sense of it and find the best approaches to regulate it.
 
An interesting turn is the great concern of AI´s ethics. I clearly understand the worries about making AI work ethically. However, that level of concern about ethical behavior is not shown when talking about humans, governments, and organizations. Why do we not ask for ethical regulations of politicians and governments? Is fighting discrimination in the real world easier than in the digital realm?
 
Three years ago, zoom diplomacy, vaccine diplomacy, and AI diplomacy were brand new terms. Today, even after the reopening of the world, most of the meetings worldwide are being held online, saving money and time but missing the human connection. Digital nomads have turned the globe into their offices, and many people have yet to return, if they ever do, to an office building.
 
Nowadays, diplomacy might be living its fifth evolutionary tipping point, with the confrontation between traditional views of sovereignty and innovative forms of global governance (Neumann, 2020). The big problem is that time is running out, particularly regarding climate change. Just read the headlines this summer regarding the scorching temperatures worldwide.
 
In terms of public diplomacy, the changes in the last years have been difficult to adjust. The transformation of Twitter into something else impacts the digital strategies of many countries, especially for basic accounts. Closing the door of data for research purposes is making it more challenging to listen and engage with audiences. The arrival of deep fakes, like Pope Francis wearing a puffer white jacket, is affecting the credibility of social media, reducing opportunities for governments to engage with foreign audiences. Disinformation is breaking havoc and helping radical views of people, politicians, and governments, making it more difficult to find common ground and collaborations.
 
Regarding consular diplomacy, the pandemic pushed it into the forefront of every ministry of foreign affairs. Foreign ministers and public servants at home, ambassadors, diplomats, and consular officers overseas all work together to help stranded citizens abroad while countries close their borders. Many MFAs are still struggling to meet the demand for documentary services, as the backlog of visas, passports, and other consular documents has not been solved. 
 
Lately, there has been a growing amount of research on consular diplomacy, but the field has not yet matured. Many studies have identified consular services as a prime target for using AI systems to manage them.
 
Despite the challenges that humanity confronts today, blogging has been a great experience that has opened the door to things I would not have thought of. Here are some of the milestones that I have achieved in the last three years of having my blog: 

• Publishing my article Beyond Traditional Boundaries: The Origins and Features of the Public-Consular Diplomacy of Mexico in the Journal of Public Diplomacy.  
• Teaching has been an extraordinary experience, full of challenges and rewards.
• Connecting with scholars and practitioners from around the world, some of whom I now call friends, has been extremely rewarding, allowing me to expand my ideas. 
• Writing has not been easy, especially if you do it in another language, but it has pushed me to think deeply about the influence of languages in the world, diplomacy, and my own life. I even got Writer´s block!
• Learning has been amazing, from pedagogical techniques to the intricacies of academic publishing, blogging, SEO strategies, and lately, everything about AI.
• Reading a substantial number of articles, books, studies, blogs, and even tweets to write about current events and apply new teaching pedagogies. 
• Experimenting with new artificial intelligence applications. See below for one example. 
• Participating and presenting at various international conventions. 
• Sharing ideas, bibliography, resources, and some of Mexico´s key experiences.

 
I am optimistic that the next three years will be better than the last, maybe just because we are reaching a breaking point. But also because people worldwide want a better future for themselves and their children.
 
Neumann, I. B (2020). Diplomatic tense: A social evolutionary perspective on diplomacy. Manchester Univesity Press.
 
Experimenting with AI 
​
Below is a list created by generative AI about the significant milestones of diplomacy in the last three years. Do you agree with the results?
 
Prompt: You are a professor of diplomatic studies. Identify the major changes in the practice of diplomacy that have occurred since January 2020, giving a brief description and using bullets. Please be specific and concise.
 
Bing.chat (creative mode) response:
Some of the major changes in the practice of diplomacy that have occurred since January 2020 are:

• The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and its global impact, which challenged the multilateral cooperation and coordination, as well as the health and humanitarian response of the UN and other international organizations.
• The rise of tensions and conflicts in various regions, such as the Middle East, Africa, and Asia, which required diplomatic efforts to prevent escalation and promote dialogue and peace. Some examples are the Iran nuclear deal, the Libya civil war, the Ethiopia-Eritrea border dispute, and the India-China border standoff.
• The shift in the U.S. foreign policy under the Biden administration, which signaled a return to multilateralism and engagement with allies and partners, as well as a renewed commitment to human rights, democracy, and climate action.
• The emergence of new issues and challenges that require global cooperation and innovation, such as cyber security, digital diplomacy, artificial intelligence, and space exploration.

 
Bard by Google: 
Sure, here are the major changes in the practice of diplomacy that have occurred since January 2020:

• The rise of virtual diplomacy: The COVID-19 pandemic has forced diplomats to conduct much of their work online, through video conferencing and other virtual platforms. This has led to a new normal for diplomacy, with many experts predicting that virtual diplomacy will continue to be an important tool even after the pandemic is over.
• The increasing importance of soft power: In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries have turned to soft power, such as cultural diplomacy and educational exchanges, to maintain their influence abroad. This is because soft power is seen as a more effective way to build relationships and cooperation in the long term.
• The growing role of non-state actors: Non-state actors, such as international organizations, businesses, and civil society groups, are playing an increasingly important role in diplomacy. This is because they often have more expertise and resources than governments, and they can be more nimble and flexible in responding to challenges.
• The need for more inclusive diplomacy: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for more inclusive diplomacy that takes into account the needs and concerns of all stakeholders. This includes women, youth, and marginalized groups.
• The challenges of cyber diplomacy: The rise of cyberwarfare and other forms of cyber threats has created new challenges for diplomacy. Governments are now grappling with how to deter and respond to these threats in a way that does not escalate tensions.

These are just some of the major changes that have occurred in the practice of diplomacy since January 2020. It remains to be seen how these changes will shape diplomacy in the years to come
 
Perplexity
Major changes in the practice of diplomacy since January 2020 include:

• Diplomacy during the COVID-19 pandemic: The pandemic has affected the way diplomacy is conducted, with many meetings and negotiations taking place virtually
• Diplomatic transformation: The Trump administration's attacks on U.S. diplomacy and decades of neglect have led to a need for a renewal of diplomatic capacity, with a focus on reinventing diplomacy for a new era 
• U.S.-China relations: The relationship between the U.S. and China has become increasingly tense, with China asserting itself more aggressively and the U.S. taking a more confrontational approach
• Emerging issues in economic diplomacy: Economic diplomacy has become more important, with countries using development aid, multilateral institutions, economic sanctions, and trade barriers to achieve their goals

 
Overall, the changing nature of diplomacy in the 21st century requires sustained attention and adaptation to meet the challenges of today and tomorrow.


DISCLAIMER: All views expressed on this blog are that of the author and do not represent the opinions of any other authority, agency, organization, employer or company.

 
The avalanche of new Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems is non-stop. It is impossible to keep up with the AI race that began in earnest with the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022 (Manor 2023f). Today, at least four Large Language Models (LLMs) compete for the world’s attention: ChatGPT (including Bing.chat), Bard, Llama 2, and Claude. Not all are available in every country, and some are free. Many questions about Machine Learning (ML) have been raised, from the data sets used for their training, including privacy and intellectual property rights, to their biases and hallucinations. AI could prove to be a hugely disrupting force.
 
Considering the fast pace of development, it is hard to grasp AI's impact on diplomacy. However, there is a growing number of studies about how these new systems are changing diplomacy.
 
In this blog post, I continue with the Diplomacy 4.0 series. First, I explain why generative AI differs from previous AI systems, followed by an analysis of ML as a tool for diplomacy. In another post, I will write about AI as a topic of diplomacy and the geopolitical impact that it is having. To learn about AI basics, check out my blog post, Diplomacy 4.0: The basics of Artificial Intelligence. 
 
1. Why all the hype about AI if it has been with us for many years? 
 
First, it is crucial to understand why the arrival of ChatGPT generated such an uproar. Manor (2023a; 2023b, 2023e) indicates that the significant factor of ChatGPT, a generative AI system, is that every single person with a computer and internet connection could use it. People do not need coding abilities or advanced mathematical training, so these systems “enable everyday users to harness the awesome power of AI” (Manor, 2023e). I am an example of this revolution, as I have used it to create a short video, suggest titles for my blog posts, such as this one, summarize articles, and experiment with a Chatbot. 
 
The new LLMs´ capability to converse with us in a human-like manner rather than with computational codes is a game-changing experience. Furthermore, the ability to continue learning and develop new skills has been breathtaking, making some AI experts nervous and leading to a request to pause its development.
 
Besides, technological developments, from the written word to telegraphy and the internet, have always changed diplomatic practices, so the AI revolution is not different from the previous advances. However, up until now, humans were the only actors. So, with AI, a new era of interactions between humans and machines is emerging. For a historical review of the relationship between technology and diplomacy, visit the excellent site created by DiploFoundation.
 
So, how is AI changing diplomacy? One way to study the effects of ML in diplomacy is by looking at the relationship between the two.
 
2. Three perspectives on the relationship between diplomacy and artificial intelligence
 
A few years ago, the DiploFoundation proposed a framework for analyzing the relationship between diplomacy and AI programs (2019, p. 6). The study states that we need to see it from three different perspectives:

1. AI as a tool for diplomacy, which entails all the new ways MFAs and diplomats can use it to perform their activities. 
2. AI as a topic of diplomacy centered on the tasks that diplomats have to implement to regulate and organize ML at the local, bilateral, and multilateral arenas. 
3. The consequences of AI on the international system, particularly geopolitics (DiploFoundation, 2019, p. 14-16).

 
As mentioned, I focus on the first issue in this post. I will write about the other two in a separate post.
 
3. AI as a tool for diplomacy
 
In recent years, a small but steady flow of studies have analyzed how AI can support the core diplomatic functions of communication, representation, and negotiation (see list of resources at the bottom of the post). 
 
The ability of ML to process enormous quantities of data in a few seconds and the multiple ways of analyzing data is crucial for diplomacy. “AI can be a useful tool in facilitating tasks that require diplomats to work with, digest, or research vast amounts of text” (DiploFoundation, 2019, p. 26). AI could “mine internal knowledge to provide insights” (Tarar 2023a) that diplomats might miss on different subjects, possibly expanding the options available to move forward. Having these types of resources would enhance the diplomat´s analysis and decision-making (Galeotti, 2023).
 
Among the different options, Deloitte AI Institute for Government & Google Cloud have identified four different uses for AI: automate, predict, detect, and simulate (2022, p. 5-6) across three core functions: diplomacy, foreign assistance, and consular affairs, plus an additional one centered on mission-enabling functions (Ibid, p. 7-10).
 
Even though there have been some issues with AI for hiring people, such as the one in Amazon, the U.S. Department of State is applying AI systems in the evaluation process of future diplomats. ML reviews thousands of essays submitted in the recruitment process (Keohan & Kralev, 2022). 
 
Other possible uses of ML systems for diplomacy are sentiment, predictive, and descriptive analysis (Bjola, 2019, p. 5). Manor and Tarar (2023a; 2023b) suggest that AI could save diplomats time by creating official documents and statements.
 
AI could bridge the gap between people speaking different languages, as it can be used for interpreting in real time. It could also help translate newspapers and social media postings (Tarar, 2023b). However, relying solely upon these systems could be problematic by ignoring “cultural differences and nuances in intercultural communication” (Kurbalija, 2023). 
 
Many new ML applications are available now to help transcribe videos and audio in a fraction of the time humans; it could help in the tedious task of creating meetings´ minutes and do-outs (Tarar, 2023b). For example, the DiploFoundation used its DiploGPT system to provide a “just-in-time reporting from the six hour” UN Security Council debate titled Futureproofing trust for sustaining peace that took place on May 3, 2023 (DiploFoundation, 2023a; DiploFoundation, 2023b). 
 
Another use of AI is to train diplomats using simulations. Recently, Teleanu (2023) shared her experience using a Chabot in a simulation of a multilateral negotiation in a digital governance course. LLMs could also be helpful to do research (Tarar, 2023b) and teach and learn new abilities and skills if used correctly (Mollick, 2022; Mollick, 2023a, 2023b, 2023c).
 
Some studies analyze or propose specific areas in which AI can enhance the work of diplomats and ministries of foreign affairs (MFAs), such as consular services, negotiations, crisis management, and public diplomacy. So, let’s review each of these four topics. 
 
3.1 Consular Services
 
Many studies have identified consular affairs as an area that could benefit from AI. (Bjola, 2019; Bjola, 2020; Deloitte, 2022; Manor, 2023a; Manor, 2023f, Tarar 2023a). As an area of routine operations based on processes, some consular services could automatize with AI (Bjola, 2019, p. 4; Deloitte, 2022, p. 8-9).
 
Today, some countries are already implementing ML programs in consular services. Canada (Laferrière & McPherson, 2019), Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Hungary, and Finland are already using AI in some visa and migration procedures, including identity fraud detection, cases management, and dealing with customers (European Migration Network, 2022, p. 9-12). Besides, eleven European countries are working on several AI projects. To see all of them, see European Migration Network, 2022, p. 11-12.
 
During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, several MFAs utilized chatbots to provide information to their citizens stranded abroad due to the closing of borders (Birka, Kļaviņš, & Kits, 2022).
 
3.2 Crises management and prevention
 
MFAs, including the UK and Germany, are already deploying “AI tools to monitor open data for early crisis detection – with the aim of expanding this towards gaining insights for crisis prevention” (DiploFoundation, 2019, p. 26). ML systems “can make sense of the nature and gravity of the events in real-time, streamline the decision-making process, manage the public’s expectations, and facilitate crisis termination” (Bjola, 2019, p. 5).
 
3.3 Public Diplomacy
 
Public diplomacy is another area in which ML systems could make significant contributions. For example, “AI could assist these [public diplomacy] efforts by providing reliable diagnostics of the scope conditions for impact via network, cluster and semantic analyses” (Bjola, 2019, p. 6; Bjola, 2020, p. 29). Besides, Williams & Otto (2022) analyze the different issues related to AI that affect the public diplomacy of Iran and the United States, providing some examples.
 
Stanzel and Voelsen (2022) have proposed using ML to perform sentiment analysis of public media regarding a trade negotiation (p. 27), which can also be used for public diplomacy. Also, ML could improve the performance of a campaign by adopting a more attractive narrative (Manor, 2023e).
 
3.4 Negotiations 
 
Negotiation, an essential aspect of diplomacy, can also be enhanced using AI systems (Manor, 2023a). Programs like Cognitive Trade Advisor, which “answers questions on rules of origin across a vast number of trade agreements,” can assist negotiations, especially by small countries (DiploFoundation, 2019, p. 26).
 
In exciting research about the usage of AI in diplomatic negotiations based on two case studies, Stanzel and Voelsen (2022) conclude that AI “has the potential to become an important, possibly indispensable tool for preparing and conducting diplomatic negotiations…and those who best succeed in embracing the possibilities of machine learning will have an advantage in negotiations” (p. 30). Furthermore, they made some recommendations, including to experiment and appraise these systems, create a data strategy, “establish and institutionalize appropriate networks” (Ibid, p. 31) “and draw up normative guidelines for the use of AI in the context of diplomacy” (Ibid, p. 6).
 
4. Challenges of AI as a tool for diplomacy 
 
As seen here, MFAs and diplomats can benefit from using AI systems. However, to take full advantage, they need to overcome some challenges and mitigate the inherent risks. “ChatGPT, the next generation of conversational AI, could have a profound impact on diplomacy, disrupting how diplomats communicate, negotiate, and manage crises” (Bjola & Manor, 2023).
 
One of the most significant tests is the potential for AI to generate disinformation and deep fakes on an enormous scale, which could be impossible to identify and could dampen the ability of diplomats to respond (Manor, 2023d; 2023g). According to Manor (2023g), this could lead to multiple realities. “Gaps between diplomats’ statements and ChatGPT answers may thus decrease public confidence in diplomats and diplomatic institutions” (Manor 2023e). Two examples were Pope Francis wearing a puffer white jacket that became viral or Donald Trump being arrested by the police.
 
Generative AI already poses a challenge to managing countries' image and reputation, as shown by Manor (2023c) in the cases of Poland, Palestine, and China, where the image these governments try to portray differs from the perspective provided by chatbots. Besides, “AI-generated content could negatively impact a nation's reputation, the credibility of its leaders and undo previous diplomatic efforts” (Bjola & Manor, 2023). All these are particularly worrisome, considering that the media has pushed the narrative of AI systems as trustworthy and credible (Manor, 2023c; 2023a; 2023e). 
 
Besides, there is growing evidence that most ML programs have some biases in favor of Western perspectives vs. the rest of the world. (Manor 2023c; 2023e). Furthermore, the foundational models used for most chatbots have centered on English language sources, affecting the views and perspectives of other languages, including their computational costs.
 
Manor (2023a) details that one of the main challenges of AI systems such as ChatGPT is continuing to expand the gap between reality and the views generated by digital technologies that support the growing attraction of populist leaders. These leaders can undermine governments’ institutions, including diplomats, and affect their efforts to find global solutions to global problems. This view contradicts Simon Anholt´s proposal in the Good Country Index, in which governments should have a dual mandate: support their citizens while backing the world at large. 
 
Another challenge is the effect of LLMs on the agency of diplomats. Bjola and Manor (2023) explain that “while automation may be cost-effective, it may not necessarily translate into effectiveness in diplomacy, which relies heavily on informal conversations and personal relationships between diplomats.” 
 
AI training for diplomats and other actors involved in foreign policy is essential to fully take advantage of ML benefits. Experimenting with LLMs will help diplomats identify these technologies' potential pitfalls (Manor, 2023g). However, “placing more diplomats in front of computer screens and training them to converse with AIs rather than humans may result in diplomats who are ill-equipped to manage diplomatic relations with other states” (Bjola & Manor, 2023).

It is also crucial that diplomats understand that anything they feed into the AI systems could be used for training; therefore, it is imperative to avoid providing sensitive and confidential information (Tarar, 2023b). I wonder if it could be possible that by good prompting and some hacks, people can pinpoint some data provided to the LLM with confidential information. 
 
One way to meet these challenges is to regulate AI (Manor 2023a), an issue that will be covered in the next post. 
 
5. Preliminary conclusions
 
Generative AI has arrived, and it is not going anywhere. The genie is out of the bottle. Therefore, governments, diplomats, and people cannot relax and wait and see what happens next. They must develop a comprehensive approach that includes training for everybody, some sort of regulations, and trends analysis. 
 
A meaningful action that MFAs can implement now is engaging in technology diplomacy or Techplomacy, which entails dialogue and building relationships with the tech ecosystem, including direct contact with the Tech giants, most of which are at the forefront of the AI race. Countries like Australia, France, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom have gone further and have designed digital foreign policy strategies, which I believe is a must in today´s world, more and more embedded in the cyber realm. See also Tech diplomacy practice in the San Francisco Bay Area.
 
In the next blog post, I will focus on AI as a topic for Diplomacy and the impact that LLMs are having on the geopolitics of today´s global disorder, as ML is becoming a source of power. 
 
You can also read my blog posts about the subject here:

• Diplomacy and Technology: The future is happening now (January 18, 2023) diplomacy-and-technology-the-future-is-happening-now.html
• Digital Diplomacy 4.0: The Future is Now (May 2, 2023) digital-diplomacy-40-the-future-is-now.html
• Digital Diplomacy 4.0: Tech Diplomacy (May 8, 2023) digital-diplomacy-40-tech-diplomacy.html
• Digital Diplomacy 4.0: The Basics of Artificial Intelligence (June 7, 2023) digital-diplomacy-40-the-basics-of-artificial-intelligence.html
• Diplomacy 4.0: Resources on Diplomacy and Artificial Intelligence (November 11, 2023) diplomacy-40-resources-on-diplomacy-and-artificial-intelligence.html

 
 
Resources on AI and Diplomacy
 
Here is a list of resources on AI and diplomacy. Please share new ones!
 
AI tools and application/experiments/usage 
 
Diplo AI Writer @ DiploFoundation is a DiploFoundation artificial intelligence writer who publishes blog posts about the subject.
 
HumAInism by DiploFoundation has some AI tools related to diplomacy and arts.
 
Can ChatGPT Explain Geopolitics? is an exercise to compare two essays and test if you can identify the one written by AI. It is published by Foreign Policy magazine.
 
Interactive webpage about the cost of AI in different languages (Tokenization fairness).
 
Webpages
 
Artificial Intelligence and Diplomacy by DiploFoundation. 
 
Artificial Intelligence by Digwatch (Geneva Internet Platform)
 
Center for AI and Digital Policy
 
Center for the Advancement of Trustworthy AI
 
Partnership on AI
 
Videos
 
Artificial Intelligence and Diplomacy Webinar. UNITAR and UOC. (2023, February 15).
 
AI and Diplomacy: Challenges and opportunities. UNITAR (2023, May 10)
 
Studies and articles 
 
Bjola, C. (2019, October 19). Diplomacy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Real Institute Elcano. 
 
Bjola, C. (2020). Diplomacy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. EDA Working Paper. Emirates Diplomatic Academy. 
 
Bjola, C. & Manor, I. (2023, April 25). ChatGPT: The end of diplomacy as we know it. Global Policy.
 
Cocking, S. (2016, September 19). Using algorithms to achieve digital diplomacy. A conversation with Elad Ratson, Director of R&D at Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Irish Tech News.
 
Deloitte AI Institute for Government & Google Cloud. (2022). Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Modernize American Statecraft. 
 
Dickow, M. and Jacob, D. (2018). The Global Debate on the Future of Artificial Intelligence. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik [SWV] Comment No. 23, p. 7.
 
Digwatch. (2019, February 5). Artificial intelligence and diplomacy: A new tool for diplomacy? EVENT REPORT. Digwatch. Geneva Internet Platform.
 
Digwatch. (2023, July 17). UN Security Council convenes to discuss AI risks. Digwatch. Geneva Internet Platform
 
DiploFoundation. (2019). Mapping the challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence for the conduct of diplomacy. DiploFoundation and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland. 
 
DiploFoundation. (2023, May 3). First full AI-reporting from the UN meeting. DiploFoundation blog.
 
DiploFoundation. (2023, May 3). AI-based report of United Nations Security Council debate marks start of a new era in multilateral diplomacy. DiploFoundation blog.
 
Elia Valori, G. (2023, July 8). Artificial Intelligence and the New World Order (1). Modern Diplomacy. 
 
Elia Valori, G. (2023, July 30). AI and the new world order: Economy and war (2). Modern Diplomacy.
 
European Migration Network. (2022). The use of digitalisation and artificial intelligence in migration management: Joint EMN-OECD Inform. 
 
Galeotti, M. (2023, January 7). The age of AI diplomacy. The Spectator.
 
Keohan, C. & Kralev, N. (2022, August 7). Want to Be a Diplomat? You Must Make it Past and A.I.’ Gateway’. Diplomatic Diary blog. Washington International Diplomatic Academy.
 
Kurbalija, J. (2023, May 1). Why might AI cause more ´lost in translation´ worldwide? DiploFoundation Blog.
 
Kurbajila, J. (2023, June 12). The case for bottom-up AI. Al Jazeera. 
 
Kurbalija, J. (2023, August 1). What can Socrates teach us about AI and prompting? DiploFoundation Blog. 
 
Laferrière, H. & McPherson, A. (2019, April 24). Augmented Decision-Making @ IRCC. Presentation to the Symposium on Algorithmic Government. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada.
 
Lederer, E. (2023, July 3). UN Council to hold first meeting on potential threats of artificial intelligence to global peace. AP News.
 
Manor, I. (2023, February 21). The AI Moves In: ChatGPT’s Impact on Digital Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog. 
 
Manor, I. (2023, March 30). ChatGPT and the Future of Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog. 
 
Manor, I. (2023, April 4). ChatGPT and the Future of Diplomacy - Part 2. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog. 
 
Manor, I. (2023, April 18). ChatGPT and the Future of Diplomacy - Part 3. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog. 
 
Manor, I. (2023, June 15). AI’s Impact on Public Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog. 
 
Manor, I. (2023, June 27). The Many Races that will shape AI. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog. 
 
Manor, I. (2023, July 4). Real Fakes and the Future of Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.
 
Manor, I. (2023, August 15). Towards the Strategic Use of AI in Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy blog.
 
O´Neil, L (2023, August 12). The Truth in Tech: These Women Tried to Warn Us about AI. Rolling Stone.
 
Petrov, A., La Malfa, E., Torr, P. H.S., & Bibi, A. (2023, May 17). Language Model Tokenizers Introduce Unfairness Between Languages. ArXiv:2350.1542.
 
Scott, B., Heumann, S., & Lorenz, P. (2018). Artificial Intelligence and Foreign Policy. Stiftung Neue Veranwortung.
 
Stanzel, V. & Voelsen, D. (2022). Diplomacy and Artificial Intelligence Reflections on Practical Assistance for Diplomatic Negotiations. SWP Research Paper. 
 
Strachan, G. & Manor, I. (2023, July 14). ‘I can be a bastard too’- ChatGPT’s Real Contribution to Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.
 
Tarar, Z. (2023, February 23). Analysis - Could AI change the business of diplomacy? The Diplomatic Pouch at Medium.
 
Tarar, Z. (2023, February 27). Analysis - Which AI tools should diplomats use today? The Diplomatic Pouch at Medium. 
 
Tarar, Z. (2023, August 28). Analysis - Harnessing AI for diplomacy: Five tools to make your work easier. The Diplomatic Pouch at Medium
 
Teleanu, S (2023, August 21). A journey of discovery: Using simulation and AI to teach and learn about digital governance. DiploFoundation Blog. 
 
Williams, A., Micali, M. & Gebru, T. (2022, October 23). The Exploited Labor Behind Artificial Intelligence. NOEMA.
 
Williams, R. & Otto, L. (2022). Artificial Intelligence as a Tool of Public Diplomacy: Communication between the United States and Iran. The Thinker 90(1) p. 28-40.
 
Information about using AI for teaching and learning
 
Mollick, E. (2022, December 13). How to…use AI to teach some of the hardest skills.  One Useful Thing blog.
 
Mollick, E. (2023, January 24). The practical guide to using AI to do stuff. One Useful Thing blog.
 
Mollick, E. (2023, March 17). Using AI to make teaching easier & more impactful. One Useful Thing blog.
 
Mollick, E. (2023, July 15). How to Use AI to Do Stuff: An Opinionated Guide. One Useful Thing blog.
 
Mollick, E. Video series on Practical AI for Teachers and Students. YouTube.
 
 
References
 
Birka, I., Kļaviņš, D., & Kits, R. (2022). Duty of Care: Consular Diplomacy Response of Baltic and Nordic Countries to COVID-19. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 18(1), p. 133-164. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-bja10115
Bjola, C. (2019, October 19). Diplomacy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Real Institute Elcano. 
Bjola, C. (2020). Diplomacy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. EDA Working Paper. Emirates Diplomatic Academy. 
Bjola, C. & Manor, I. (2023, April 25). ChatGPT: The end of diplomacy as we know it. Global Policy.
Deloitte AI Institute for Government & Google Cloud. (2022). Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Modernize American Statecraft. 
DiploFoundation. (2019). Mapping the challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence for the conduct of diplomacy. DiploFoundation and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland. 
DiploFoundation. (2023a, May 3). First full AI-reporting from the UN meeting. DiploFoundation blog.
DiploFoundation. (2023b, May 3). AI-based report of United Nations Security Council debate marks start of a new era in multilateral diplomacy. DiploFoundation blog.
European Migration Network. (2022). The use of digitalisation and artificial intelligence in migration management: Joint EMN-OECD Inform. 
Galeotti, M. (2023, January 7). The age of AI diplomacy. The Spectator.
Keohan, C. & Kralev, N (2022, August 7). Want to Be a Diplomat? You Must Make it Past and A.I.’ Gateway’. Diplomatic Diary blog. Washington International Diplomatic Academy.
Kurbalija, J. (2023, May 1). Why might AI cause more ´lost in translation´ worldwide? DiploFoundation Blog.
Laferrière, H. & McPherson, A. (2019, April 24). Augmented Decision-Making @ IRCC. Presentation to the Symposium on Algorithmic Government. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada.
Manor, I. (2023a, February 21). The AI Moves In: ChatGPT’s Impact on Digital Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog. 
Manor, I. (2023b, March 30). ChatGPT and the Future of Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog. 
Manor, I. (2023c, April 4). ChatGPT and the Future of Diplomacy - Part 2. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog. 
Manor, I. (2023d, April 18). ChatGPT and the Future of Diplomacy - Part 3. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog. 
Manor, I. (2023e, June 15). AI’s Impact on Public Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog. 
Manor, I. (2023f, June 27). The Many Races that will shape AI. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog. 
Manor, I. (2023g, July 4). Real Fakes and the Future of Diplomacy. Exploring Digital Diplomacy Blog.
Mollick, E. (2022, December 13). How to…use AI to teach some of the hardest skills.  One Useful Thing blog.
Mollick, E. (2023a, January 24). The practical guide to using AI to do stuff. One Useful Thing blog.
Mollick, E. (2023b, March 17). Using AI to make teaching easier & more impactful. One Useful Thing blog.
Mollick, E. (2023c, July 15). How to Use AI to Do Stuff: An Opinionated Guide. One Useful Thing blog.
Stanzel, V. & Voelsen, D. (2022). Diplomacy and Artificial Intelligence Reflections on Practical Assistance for Diplomatic Negotiations. SWP Research Paper. 
Tarar, Z. (2023a, February 27). Analysis - Which AI tools should diplomats use today? The Diplomatic Pouch at Medium. 
Tarar, Z. (2023b, August 28). Analysis - Harnessing AI for diplomacy: Five tools to make your work easier. The Diplomatic Pouch at Medium.
Teleanu, S (2023, August 21). A journey of discovery: Using simulation and AI to teach and learn about digital governance. DiploFoundation Blog. 
Williams, R. & Otto, L. (2022). Artificial Intelligence as a Tool of Public Diplomacy: Communication between the United States and Iran. The Thinker 90(1) p. 28-40.
 
DISCLAIMER: All views expressed on this blog are those of the author and do not represent the opinions of any other authority, agency, organization, employer or company.

​Below are some images created by Bing.chat. Interestingly, I explicitly asked not to include robots, but the system did not seem to care.  What are your thoughts?